AU Blogspot

 
              Thanks to lucianvenutian for permission to use this Photo.

It’s true that controversy is often manufactured by “the media” to create “news,” but I find the the issue of sex offenders’ rights, particularly those convicted of crimes against children, to only be controversial if seen through a filter more theoretical than pragmatic. In legal theory, the general question of whether a mandated process of full disclosure violates the rights of these offenders is a legitimate one.  However; there is no moral equivalency between the rights afforded say someone convicted of a felony property crime in the past vs. someone convicted of a felony sex offense.  Yes, I would like to know if the guy next store to me was convicted a burglary 10 years ago, but I can ultimately accept living in the dark to preserve this individual’s right to live freely in society after paying his debt.  On the contrary, I would not accept living in the dark when it comes to compromising the safety of a defenseless child to protect the rights of a pedophile.   

There’s also a disturbing element of political correctness influencing how communities see their role in protecting their own children.  If, because of the law, there is no way to prevent a sex offender from moving into your neighborhood, it’s apparent that the instrument used to enforce the law (the police) can not be turned to for help unless it’s “after the fact.”  What does a community do under these circumstances?  

The media often characterizes communities who make it known that such offenders are not welcome as some type of vigilante mob.  This is absurd.  Yes, there are extreme cases where community members violently assault an offender to get the point across, but these are few and far between, which is why they make “the news.”  The communities that have succeeded in removing these offenders from their neighborhoods have done so through organized protests, house eggings, and tactical use of the media to apply pressure.   Although politically incorrect and offensive to legal scholars, I find these resourceful methods of forced exclusion to be perfectly reasonable.

What do you think?     

Ryan Rode
Interactive Services Manager
Ashworth School Of Legal Studies

     
              Thanks to celinecelines for permission to use this Photo.

This is a very hot topic within the criminal justice field.  As such, there is a lot of misconception about this defense.  One of the most recent cases that has affected legislation is that of Andrea Yates.

For full trial coverage, you can go here.

What this case did for the state of Texas, known for its TOUGH ON CRIME and zero tolerance for murder, ESPECIALLY of children, was sign into legislation a bill concerning Postpartum Depression. 

For a history of the insanity defense check out this terrific resource.

The major misconception about the insanity defense is that many people believe that just because a defendent has chosen this defense, they are going to get off.  Actually this isn’t the case.  According to the following statistics reported by FOX news in February 2002, the insanity defense works in less than 1% of all cases.

Given the insanity rules of McNaughton, Durham, should this be a defense at all in criminal prosecution?

Betty Ray Mydland
Student
Ashworth Criminal Justice Program

The creation of the Criminal Justice “Study Hall” forum was inspired by one of your fellow students: Betty Ray Mydland.  The general concept behind this particular forum or “Study Hall” is to provide students in our various Criminal Justice programs with a dedicated “space” to openly discuss criminal justice program issues, lessons, topics, careers, questions, news, ideas, etc.

Thanks to Betty for this excellent recommendation. Well, the forum has been created. It’s up to our forum community to spread the word and get as many of your peers engaged as possible. I’m really looking forward to watching this Study Hall evolve. 

If you haven’t registered for the Ashworth University Student Forum yet, take a minute to do so.  It literally only takes a minute before you’re ready to join the discussion. 

We encourage all of our Criminal Justice/Legal Studies students to begin participating in this new Study Hall today!  Get involved with your student community!

Here’s the link:

Criminal Justice Study Hall Forum

Ryan Rode
Interactive Services Manager
Ashworth University

            Thanks to  Alexis O’Toole for permission to use this Photo. 

A pretext is an expression of a false purpose.  Its goal is to introduce an acceptable excuse in order to hide, or cloak, a person’s real intention(s).  When a private investigator uses a pretext that includes verbal communication, the focus should be toward obtaining pertinent information from sources close to the claimant, such as neighbors and fellow employees.  Avoid contact with the claimant.  If in a public location, the claimant initiates a conversation with you, you may not be held accountable.  But, if the case ever makes it to court and this evidence is introduced, it will be his or her word against yours.  Who will a judge believe?  It depends, but the risks are too great to take a chance.The following steps will assist you in conducting a pretext interview:

Step one: Drive through the area first (preferably only once) to identify the claimant’s residence and determine how to best approach the various sources, starting at the perimeter.  You may find the claimant active outside.  During a brief activity check assignment on a claimant with an alleged severe injury to the lower back, I drove into the neighborhood and noticed he was mowing the yard with a push mower.  The priority then became surveillance coupled with video documentation.  But, if there’s no such luck, continue with the initial objective.  Identify the vehicles and look for signs of activity by identifying what is visible on the property.

Step two: Park your vehicle out of view and select the pretext that seems most suited to the surroundings.  Consider the economic, social, and cultural standards of the immediate area.  Look for the neighbor whose home and property is obviously better maintained than the claimant’s.  You may find some resentment toward the claimant who, as it turns out, rents the home while others own their property.  These economic, social, cultural, and racial barriers can produce cooperative sources from either end, as long as there is some disapproval or jealousy that exists.  

Step three: Use the opening remark you make to the source to determine the pretext that will be most productive.  Even before identifying myself, which may already be evident in the outfit I’m wearing, I usually ask them in a straightforward manner if they are familiar with the claimant.  The response you get will forewarn you about the pretext you should use and could prevent you from sticking your foot in your mouth.  The response may range from a total lack of recognition to the possibility you’re speaking directly to the claimant who is visiting this source.  If anything close to the latter scenario occurs, be prepared with an alternative pretext.  Tell the source, or the claimant, that another individual recommended you talk with the claimant about something pertinent to their situation.  It could be the sale of a boat, trailer, home, or any number of other personal items.  You could even say that you were considering going to work for the claimant’s old employer and wanted their viewpoint.  If the claimant owns a particularly special automobile or boat, or even a pet, tell him or her that you’re considering buying the same car or boat and someone recommended talking with the claimant about theirs. The majority of the time the response will be a general one of acknowledgement, and you can proceed with the appropriate pretext.

Step four: When talking with these sources, act comfortable, be friendly, and look for a source who is just as talkative.  Combine a number of topics or lead the source to believe the focus of the inquiry is anything other than the claimant.  Use a relaxed, nonchalant tone to imply the subject involving the claimant is relatively unimportant.  Construct your questions to prompt detailed explanations and avoid yes and no responses.  Unless it suits the pretext, don’t carry a pen, clipboard, or notepad.  Retain the details mentally and record them as soon as the interview is concluded.

Larry W. Davis
Private Investigation Program Instructor
Ashworth University

 
              Thanks to celinecelines for permission to use this Photo.

In this book, Professor Ewing tackles the most complex of all legal/psychological issues: the insanity defense. It has been employed thousands of times, but there is still little understanding by lawyers and psychologists of its proper use.

By analyzing some of the most well-known insanity cases in legal history, this book sheds light on the particularities of this defense; when it is successful, and when it is a sham. The casebook is an established format in which to illuminate legal questions, and yet no such book exists yet for this topic. Professor Ewing will examine 20 of the most influential and controversial insanity cases, from the recent D.C. sniper trial to Jack Ruby’s failed plea in his trial for the assassination of Lee Harvey Oswald.

The cases are all carefully chosen to illuminate different ways in which the courts have handled this defense. Throughout, the author will add his own analysis of the cases and the reasons for the verdict. (more…)

I was watching television on Monday night when a new AMBER Alert flashed on the screen.  It turns out the case in question was a hoax, but this unusual development should not detract in any way from the importance and effectiveness of this system.  For those of you unfamiliar with this law enforcement tool, an Amber Alert is a notification message that is transmitted on highway billboards as well as (commercial) television, radio, online, and wireless channels when a child has been abducted. It’s an amazing system that has literally saved hundreds of young lives in danger.  Since we have our own communications channel here with the AU Blogspot, I thought it appropriate to do our part in raising additional awareness about the purpose of AMBER Alerts.  If you have any “happy ending” stories from your state, please share them with your student community.  Thank you. 

Ryan Rode
Ashworth University